Bloodwork question about iodine. Baseline, a year in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
Tolerance and underdosing look identical from the inside, which is why the answer is usually a blood test and not more forums.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Same here.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Narrow conclusion.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions. Currently on iodine myself.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Same for me with iodine, unfortunately.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?