Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.

Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? Eight months in on glycine and it lines up.

Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Same for me with glycine, unfortunately.

Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet. Eight months in on glycine and it lines up.

Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.

Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.

Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.

Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?

Read methods.

Baseline first.

Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. How long have you been on glycine?

Same here.

What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?

My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.

Narrow conclusion.