Meta-level question: how do you evaluate evidence for iodine when the human data is thin and most trials are small?
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 4 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
Elemental versus compound weight is the trap on every one of these labels.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Two years in on iodine and it lines up.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?