I have been running vitamin K2 for three weeks and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
Fortified food counts toward the total and is always forgotten.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Same here.
Narrow conclusion.