A moderation change works well, but one thing about it could be better.
Disclosure in the first line saves a moderator five minutes and a member an argument.
Nothing here is a rule for its own sake, which is why the odd ones have a paragraph attached.
Curious what the moderators think.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Access to mugs should be on the clinical questionnaire.
Followed, this answered three questions I had.
Ten percent cuts. Slower is faster.
Print the page.
Same shape here, different drug. The thing that helped was documenting the refusal rather than re-arguing it. They refer rather than write.
Ask for the longer appointment slot. Ten minutes is not enough for a complex history and pretending otherwise wastes both your time.
Followed, this answered three questions I had.
Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.
I would stop trying to convey how bad it is and start saying what you want them to do.
The rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts, and it is always that pattern.