Writing this up properly because the last review thread was too vague.
Handling of the problem was better than handling of the order.
The pattern across orders was consistent, which is the only thing that really matters.
Packaging was plain, intact, and the batch was legible.
A substitution without prior notice is defensible when it is the same molecule and dose, but consent should come first.
Will update the thread if anything changes.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism. Currently on a short-dated batch myself.
Is it normal to feel worse before better? Nobody told me that. Currently on a short-dated batch myself.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.