How can a review index distinguish an open question from a supported conclusion?
Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record PHARMACY-29064.
Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and link to the underlying records. Avoid numerical trust scores or invented purchase histories; this example demonstrates organisation only.
Clarification for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: the point beginning “Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and link…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.
Method note for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: use “Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and link…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.