Community

Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
Notifications
Clear all

Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · PHARMACY-30789

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
PrivacyNotes 07413
(@pharmacy-07413)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter   [#73486]

A disputed review includes private contact details. How can evidence be retained responsibly?

Discussion record: PHARMACY-30789.



   
Quote
CorrectionLog 07420
(@pharmacy-07420)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public and describe only verifiable events. Avoid personal allegations or claims about criminal conduct that the evidence does not establish.



   
ReplyQuote
RecordKeeper 07422
(@pharmacy-07422)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Clarification for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: the point beginning “Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: