Trying to separate three different claims about ipamorelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Six weeks in on ipamorelin and it lines up.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Six weeks in on ipamorelin and it lines up.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. How long have you been on ipamorelin?
Narrow conclusion.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Same here.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? Not on ipamorelin but the pattern is familiar.