Trying to separate three different claims about TB-500: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
What the peptide class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
Cold storage, light protection, and a date on the vial. Boring, and it removes half the variables.
Anyone got a paper worth reading on this rather than a write-up of a paper?
Read methods.
Narrow conclusion.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet. Same for me with TB-500, unfortunately.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Same here.
Same for me with TB-500, unfortunately.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Same here.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?