Long post, sorry. Zadaxin (thymosin alpha-1): what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
What is the strongest human evidence anyone here has actually read, not skimmed?
Narrow conclusion.
Baseline first.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Read methods.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Narrow conclusion.
Baseline first.
Narrow conclusion.
Same here.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.