Trying to separate three different claims about tesamorelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Water retention and mild lethargy in the first fortnight are the usual pattern.
How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial. Currently on tesamorelin myself.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.