Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
21/09/2021 11:35 pm
I have been running GHK-Cu for two months and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took two months to be sure.
Injection site reactions are trivial until they are not, and a fresh needling technique removes half of them.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
22/09/2021 12:22 am
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Not on GHK-Cu but the pattern is familiar.