Long post, sorry. BPC-157: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
Same here.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?