DSIP and the reconstitution argument. Half the threads on this are arguing past each other about arithmetic.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
What the peptide class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
I have started logging dose, time, and sleep because otherwise the anecdote is just a mood.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing. Fatigue was my main issue with DSIP too.
Narrow conclusion.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Not on DSIP but the pattern is familiar.