Trying to separate three different claims about ipamorelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Same here.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid. Same for me with ipamorelin, unfortunately.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Vivid dreams was my main issue with ipamorelin too.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Not on ipamorelin but the pattern is familiar.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Baseline first.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?