Trying to separate three different claims about TB-500: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Forum consensus and published consensus diverged here about five years ago and never reconverged.
Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
Animal data is much of what exists here and the human stuff is thin and small.
The interesting question is not whether it works but for whom and at what cost.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Narrow conclusion.
Narrow conclusion.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Narrow conclusion.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Same for me with TB-500, unfortunately.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Read methods.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Read methods.
Baseline first.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. How long have you been on TB-500?