Trying to separate three different claims about hexarelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful. The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Narrow conclusion.
Same here.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Not on hexarelin but the pattern is familiar.
Narrow conclusion.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Currently on hexarelin myself.