Same here.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation. How long have you been on semaglutide?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Nausea was my main issue with semaglutide too.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on semaglutide myself.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes. Same for me with semaglutide, unfortunately.