Long post, sorry. Melanotan II: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Animal data is much of what exists here and the human stuff is thin and small.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation start?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? How long have you been on melanotan II?
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Baseline first.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Not on melanotan II but the pattern is familiar.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.