Trying to separate three different claims about hexarelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 6 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
Timing around sleep matters more than absolute dose with this class.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Narrow conclusion.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Baseline first.
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? How long have you been on hexarelin?
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. How long have you been on hexarelin?
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.