Not a sourcing thread. BPC-157, four months, and what I can and cannot conclude from my own experience.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Injection site reactions are trivial until they are not, and a fresh needling technique removes half of them.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
Same here.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?