Long post, sorry. BPC-157: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Willing to accept that my own experience is the weakest evidence in the room.
Same here.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
A plausible mechanism is not an outcome, and this class is the textbook example.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Same for me with BPC-157, unfortunately.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Same for me with BPC-157, unfortunately.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.