This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted. Same for me with ipamorelin, unfortunately.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Narrow conclusion.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on ipamorelin myself.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Same here.