Trying to separate three different claims about TB-500: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month. Not on TB-500 but the pattern is familiar.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Not on TB-500 but the pattern is familiar.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Baseline first.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist. Not on TB-500 but the pattern is familiar.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this? Same for me with TB-500, unfortunately.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.