Trying to separate three different claims about ipamorelin: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Willing to accept that my own experience is the weakest evidence in the room.
Same here.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month. Same for me with ipamorelin, unfortunately.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation. Currently on ipamorelin myself.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Same for me with ipamorelin, unfortunately.
Same here.
Four months in on ipamorelin and it lines up.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Narrow conclusion.