Bloodwork question about melanotan II. Baseline, three weeks in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Animal data is much of what exists here and the human stuff is thin and small.
How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Same here.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.