Same here.
Five years in on DSIP and it lines up.
Same here.
Currently on DSIP myself.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Same here.
Same for me with DSIP, unfortunately.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero? Fatigue was my main issue with DSIP too.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. How long have you been on DSIP?