I have been running BPC-157 for a fortnight and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took a fortnight to be sure.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
Vial content, sterility and reconstitution are three separate questions and the certificate answers about one of them.
Curious whether the popular dose has any basis or is just the convenient one.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.