Long post, sorry. Ipamorelin: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Water retention and mild lethargy in the first fortnight are the usual pattern.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Read methods. Same for me with ipamorelin, unfortunately.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Same here.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.