Bloodwork question about LL-37. Baseline, two months in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
What the peptide class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
Animal data is much of what exists here and the human stuff is thin and small.
What would change your mind about this?
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial. Currently on LL-37 myself.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Currently on LL-37 myself.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Same here.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.