Long post, sorry. Ginkgo biloba: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
Standardisation matters more than dose with botanicals, and most products say nothing about it.
Anyone got a paper worth reading on this rather than a write-up of a paper?
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables. Currently on ginkgo biloba myself.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Baseline first.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. How long have you been on ginkgo biloba?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Mild sedation was my main issue with ginkgo biloba too.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Not on ginkgo biloba but the pattern is familiar.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later. How long have you been on ginkgo biloba?