Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Not on phenylpiracetam but the pattern is familiar.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
Same here.
Currently on phenylpiracetam myself.
Same here.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Irritability was my main issue with phenylpiracetam too.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes. Currently on phenylpiracetam myself.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Two years in on phenylpiracetam and it lines up.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Not on phenylpiracetam but the pattern is familiar.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?