Trying to separate three different claims about taurine: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
Curious whether the popular dose has any basis or is just the convenient one.
Baseline first.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Baseline first.
Same here.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.