Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take. How long have you been on lion mane?

Same here.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?

I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.

Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.

Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take. A year in on lion mane and it lines up.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Currently on lion mane myself.

Same here.

How long have you been on lion mane?

Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions. Not on lion mane but the pattern is familiar.

What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?

Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.

Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.

Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.

Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.

Baseline first. Currently on lion mane myself.