Long post, sorry. Semax: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 6 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
What would change your mind about this?
Same here.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? How long have you been on semax?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Not on semax but the pattern is familiar.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Narrow conclusion.