Bloodwork question about caffeine. Baseline, a year in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Appetite suppression makes the sleep problem worse, which is the actual trap.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Read methods.
Read methods.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Not on caffeine but the pattern is familiar.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?