Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.

Baseline first.

Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.

This is the kind of post the forum exists for.

Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.

Same here.

An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?

I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true. Not on oxiracetam but the pattern is familiar.

Narrow conclusion.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?