What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Baseline first.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Baseline first.
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Same here.
Narrow conclusion.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on caffeine myself.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.