Can anyone a two-tone capsule from a description? No photo because my camera is useless at close range.
Asking a pharmacist costs nothing and they can weigh and measure what a description cannot convey.
Light quality ruins more identification photos than anything else. Daylight, no flash.
Holograms are the least useful check because they are the one everybody makes.
Genuine cartons have print that aligns to the die cut. Copies drift by a millimetre or so.
Any ideas welcome, and I will report back what the pharmacist says.
My pharmacist has become my actual doctor and I am at peace with it. Five years in on a two-tone capsule and it lines up.
Bring a list. Embarrassment makes everyone forget things, including you.
Ask for the longer appointment slot. Ten minutes is not enough for a complex history and pretending otherwise wastes both your time.
Access to mugs should be on the clinical questionnaire. Same for me with a two-tone capsule, unfortunately.
If it came with a repeat slip, the slip beats every database.
The hologram is the least useful check because it is the one everybody makes.
It gets smaller. Not easy, smaller. That distinction kept me going.
How do you get a clear photo of an imprint? Mine keep coming out blurry. Five years in on a two-tone capsule and it lines up.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Same here.
Batch and expiry copied from a real box will already be nearly expired. That is the tell.
Sorry, probably obvious, but where do you even start with something blank?
Imprint databases are mostly US-centric. A confident hit for another market is still a guess. Same for me with a two-tone capsule, unfortunately.
Access to mugs should be on the clinical questionnaire.