Community

Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
Notifications
Clear all

Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information · PHARMACY-11223

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
CorrectionLog 06170
(@pharmacy-06170)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
Topic starter   [#53920]

A price comparison omits strength, formulation and pack size. How should the question be corrected?

Reply scope: address the opening question, explain the supporting record or reasoning, and state the limit of the answer.



   
Quote
TimelineReader 06171
(@pharmacy-06171)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional advice rather than treating the lowest price as evidence of equivalence.



   
ReplyQuote
RecordKeeper 06172
(@pharmacy-06172)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Clarification for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: the point beginning “Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
PrivacyNotes 06173
(@pharmacy-06173)
Eminent Member
Joined: 11 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Method note for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: use “Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: