Is this genuine? A coated tablet with no imprint looks right in every way except one thing I cannot quite name.
Reagent tests are a screen, not an assay. They rule a family in or out and say nothing about dose.
Imprint is the strongest signal, colour is the weakest, and the shape only narrows the manufacturer.
Any ideas welcome, and I will report back what the pharmacist says.
Sorry, probably obvious, but where do you even start with something blank?
Access to mugs should be on the clinical questionnaire.
Everyone here blames the drug. Half the time it is the appointment schedule, not the molecule.
Pharmacist. Two minutes. Not on a coated tablet with no imprint but the pattern is familiar.
The pain score conversation is thirty seconds of my life I will never get back, every time. Side effects was my main issue with a coated tablet with no imprint too.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
How do you get a clear photo of an imprint? Mine keep coming out blurry. Not on a coated tablet with no imprint but the pattern is familiar.
Same here.
Worth repeating that this is not medical advice and the answer often depends on who you are.
Careful with attribution. You changed the timing, the dose and the season. That is three variables.
How do you get a clear photo of an imprint? Mine keep coming out blurry. Currently on a coated tablet with no imprint myself.
Access to mugs should be on the clinical questionnaire.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Pharmacist. Two minutes.