I have been running ostarine for three years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.

What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.

What the SARM class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.

Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.

Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.

Suppression is real and milder than the AAS equivalent, which is not the same as absent.

How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?