Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Five years in on ostarine and it lines up.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread. Same for me with ostarine, unfortunately.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Read methods. Currently on ostarine myself.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison. Five years in on ostarine and it lines up.
Baseline first. Currently on ostarine myself.
Same here.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Narrow conclusion. Currently on ostarine myself.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. How long have you been on ostarine?
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Same here.
Side effects was my main issue with ostarine too.