I have been running ligandrol for three years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took three years to be sure.
Lipids move and nobody checks them, which is why SARMs have a reputation for being harmless.
Anyone got a paper worth reading on this rather than a write-up of a paper?
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.