Not a sourcing thread. Stanozolol, three years, and what I can and cannot conclude from my own experience.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
The comparison group matters more than the compound when the outcome is something as fuzzy as focus.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
Haematocrit creep is the boring one that catches people at the six week mark.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? How long have you been on stanozolol?
Same here.