Trying to separate three different claims about RAD-140: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful. The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took five years to be sure.
Same here.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid. Five years in on RAD-140 and it lines up.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Same here.
Baseline first.
Read methods.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?