Trying to separate three different claims about hCG: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Willing to accept that my own experience is the weakest evidence in the room.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.