Trying to separate three different claims about ligandrol: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Cold storage, light protection, and a date on the vial. Boring, and it removes half the variables.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Lipids move and nobody checks them, which is why SARMs have a reputation for being harmless.
How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.