Is anyone else getting raised haematocrit from methandienone? It reads like a known thing in the literature and is oddly absent from the popular write-ups.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
Read methods. Not on methandienone but the pattern is familiar.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted. Same for me with methandienone, unfortunately.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Same here.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.